Who's the Racist?

Many are the catcalls against the elected President, Donald J. Trump, about his supposed predilection toward racism in favor of Whites/Caucasians. Why is it that only Whites are considered to be racist? What is racism, really?

In Webster's Dictionary of the American Language (1828) there is no listing for "racism" or "racist" and the definition for "race" only references the "human race," which would seem to indicate a multi-cultural view, albeit before the end of slavery in America.

Dictionary.com posts this definition of racism:

1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.


2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.


3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

While there are, no doubt, those among the members of the White/Caucasian race who do believe in the superiority of their race, they/we are by no means unique in that respect. In my view, the mere pointing of the finger at another racial group or representative of that group is tantamount to a form of racism through the arrogance of supposed superiority to the targeted group. In fact, I would suggest that the Democratic party has evidenced more racism through its "big tent" philosophy by targeting specific people groups with which to build their support base. Is anyone still aware, other than Dinesh D'Souza, that the Ku Klux Klan was the post-Civil War militia arm of the Democratic Party to keep Blacks in the South under control after their emancipation? Their method is both duplicitous and deceptive and is solely designed to foster and implement the values and beliefs of atheistic humanism.

However comical they may appear on the news or late night television, the threat to the fabric of America and even its very existence is real and even imminent. The true racists are not necessarily those being accused but rather the accusers.

And Now for the Second Amendment

My cousin posted on Facebook a link to a site in favor of stronger gun control. Now, I love my cousin dearly; she's a sweet woman who has experienced a lot in her life. However, I had to agree to disagree with her.

I learned that one of the ways the dictatorial President of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, gained such unmitigated power over the people after he allegedly stole the election was to confiscate all their weapons, leaving them physically defenseless against the police and military who backed his regime.

I am, therefore, considering purchasing a gun, if only to exercise my right under the Second Amendment to the Constitution in the Bill of Rights. Based on this information, I am recognizing this right as just as important as the right to vote. Indeed, owning a gun could have been the means for the Venezuelan people to defend their right to vote. However, since 1999 they have lived under a socialist government, instigated by Hugo Chavez.

I think we should take note and learn from this that the liberals who want to infringe on our rights to own weapons are the same people who want to have absolute sway in telling us through bureaucracy and legislation how we should live our lives. It is tantamount to an attempt at oppression.

And Greedy Universities

Here's what's on my mind...

The "pay to play" scandal of the rich and famous buying their children's way into elite universities is, in my opinion as a life-long educator, one of the worst abuses of the system, next to those universities becoming bastions and temples of the religion of Humanism.

I believe any student who has been accepted to any university under what must be considered as fraudulent means should immediately be expelled without recourse to reinstatement. Higher education is not a right under the Constitution, contrary to what many liberals may claim.

I also believe any University official who was involved in the fraudulent enrollment should no only be fired from their position but also be charged with perpetrating the fraud and spend time in jail, just like any other business executive would. In addition, I believe the parents of the students who engaged in the fraud should be charged and fined at least the amounts they paid to fraudulently enroll their child or children, the amounts they paid in tuition, fees, and expenses, AND an additional penalty amount because of other students who were unable to enroll because their child stole the seat of another student who would otherwise be able to attend.

Greedy Aircraft Manufacturers

Here's what's on my mind....

I'm not a fan of big government. I believe with the founding fathers that "That government which governs best governs least." However...

I am, like most Americans, subject to the Airlines for the sake of time when I need to travel long distances. Having worked for several years on training courseware for pilots, aircrew, and mechanics on military aircraft, I know about and understand the principles behind and necessity of pilots having information concerning Angle of Attack (AOA) sensors and indicators on their aircraft. For Boeing and other aircraft manufacturers to make this a safety option for carriers just so the manufacturer can make more money, as reported in the New York Times, to me is not only unconscionable, it is downright greedy and fueled by greed.

I think it's time for the FAA to step in, like the Japanese, and require airplane manufacturers to make ALL safety equipment that has been associated with failures and mishaps to be standard on all their aircraft. Two crashes of one aircraft model in less than six months shows a pattern of malfeasance on the part of executives of the manufacturer in thinking more about their next raise or golden parachute than on the safety of my life and the lives of my fellow passengers.

Shortcuts

     Pastor Jason Brinker at First Baptist Church, Jacksonville, NC, has been taking us through Matthew 16 with the topic "Burn the Ships" for several weeks. Yesterday something hit me that I had never seen before. It's about shortcuts and how awful they can be.
     I lead one of the Life Groups, and last week we were looking at verses 13 through 18, Pastor Jason's focal text for the previous Sunday. I took them back to the beginning of the chapter where the Pharisees and Sadducees tested Jesus by asking him for a sign to prove he was the Messiah. Now, to us Goyim it might seem like any sign would suffice. But to them, only the sign in the book of Daniel would do: he would have to reveal himself by coming in glory on the clouds and establishing his kingdom right then and there.
     What they forgot about (or just ignored) was the other sign in the book of Isaiah: "Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and he shall be called Emmanuel." And the other part: "He was despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief." And one more: "They looked on him whom they pierced." They were looking for a conquering king; but he had to come as the suffering servant first. They wanted a shortcut.
     I asked the Life Group which Messiah they thought Peter was referring to when he confessed "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God." At first they were a little confused until I reminded them about the Pharisees and Sadducees.Yesterday, we got our answer.
     This Sunday, Pastor Jason went on in the chapter to cover the turn of events when Jesus began explaining to the disciples that he would be going to Jerusalem and would have to suffer and die at the hands of the Elders and Chief Priests but that on the third day he would rise again. Peter took him aside and pretty much raked him over the coals for it, at which point Jesus called him Satan and told him to get behind him. Peter had gone from being a stone with a confession that would be the rock on which Jesus would build his community to a stumbling block to Jesus' purposes. Peter, after all, was obviously thinking like the Pharisees and Sadducees and was looking for a shortcut Messiah.
     One of the things Pastor Jason brought up was how Satan had known since the third chapter of Genesis that this was going to happen, that a son would be born to the line of Adam and Eve whose heel he would bruise at the cost of his head being crushed. This was why Satan came at Jesus in the wilderness, inviting him to make bread from a stone to satisfy what at that point was starvation. He then offered the entire world and all its riches to Jesus if he would bow down and worship Satan; another shortcut.
     Now, Satan is not his name. It's his title and means "Adversary." His name is Lucifer, which means "Light Bearer." Sometimes, Satan speaks to us through others, so Jesus could have been directly addressing Satan, or he may have merely been calling Peter an adversary. In modern English, there is an idiom to "get behind" something or someone in support. I see that application when Jesus tells Peter to get behind him, though I doubt the idiom translates well either in Greek or Aramaic.
     However, the real revelation to me was the association with the Garden of Eden and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. The serpent presented it to Eve as a shortcut to being like God, Lucifer's iniquity. That was the whole point behind the tree; God commanded them not to eat of it because he knew its true meaning. He loved them enough to want their love in return, and true love toward God starts with obedience. Because God gave us a free will to choose right from wrong, and because we like things easy, we look for shortcuts to get what we really want. Look where it's gotten us.

It's here...

I am at last gathering data for my research study to finish my dissertation for my Ph.D. in Instructional Design and Online Learning. If you are interested, you can go to my Instructional Design Blog or my IDOL Dissertation Blog to take a 4-item questionnaire to qualify as the population for the study. Thanks.

It's been a long time...

I wanted to post this in the present venue because it is really a musing, though it has spiritual elements that could classify it as a Bible study. Here's the background:
I was at a meeting last night of the Truth Project, a series by Focus on the Family that tries to help people refine their world view to make it more Biblical and less influenced by the world. I made a statement that, given the current state of our physical and mental abilities (i.e. according to some reports most people use about three percent of what their brain is actually capable of, people like Einstein used about ten percent, but Adam in his pre-Fall state used 100%), we do not understand everything in the Bible all at once. In fact, I find that as I continue to read the same passages repeatedly, I find new meaning in them for my current circumstances.
Another gentleman in the group, whom I will characterize as a literalist, took exception to my statement, thinking I was saying that the Truth in the Bible changed from time to time, from circumstance to circumstance. My Pastor rose to my defense saying that, knowing me, he knew that was not what I was saying. I agreed, reaffirming that it was just my comprehension of the Word that changed.
I mentioned to my wife a few nights ago that I am amazed that at 65 years old I am just now understanding certain facets of life and God's Word. It gave me new insight on why many of the antediluvian (pre-Noah) figures did not even start having children until they were 65 or so.
So, this morning as I was musing last night's discussion, I saw a metaphor for what I was saying. As we look into God's Word, it's like we are digging for raw treasure. Sometimes we find nuggets of gold or silver; sometimes whole veins of the raw gold or silver ore. And occasionally, we find raw gems. They are raw and impure because the Holy Spirit has not taught us how to apply them in our lives. The gold and silver ore need to be heated up until they melt and the impurities that we have attached to them in our initial readings (dross) rise to the surface to be extracted leaving the pure metal of the Spirit's perfect interpretation (1 Peter 1:7). After all, He's the one who wrote it in the first place (2 Peter 1:21). And the gems need to be processed by the Spirit as well, chipping off pieces here and there, revealing new facets, geometrically placing them in just the right places in our lives so that the finished jewel, the Spirit's application in our lives, magnificently reflects God's glory.